Humana
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Defining a set of inspiring, aspirational humanity- and environmentally-centered design principles.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Protection and promotion of human rights
- Open-source software, open data and open AI models
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
Please briefly explain your selection.
2
While AI is expensive to develop and run, largely funded by private industry, it can exist only because of the decades of shared public knowledge that has been built up over the last 40 years of internet and digitization of human learning. For this reason, all models should be open, so that activists and interested volunteers can hack the protection of human rights and mutually benefit from innovations.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
We need to proactively augment our own human intelligence in ways that complement AI. Protection and promotion of human rights does not go far enough. There needs to be a category about the promotion and cultivation of human intelligence and natural intelligence.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Access to information, job availability and upward mobility are all challenged when technology gets consolidated in centralized in the hands of a few people. We already see this happening in the United States and is a serious threat to our ability to be resilient and have meaningful work.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
The AI dialogue should be an embodied felt cosensed dialogue and experiential convening that brings to the forefront the power and benefit of natural human intelligence. It should advance international cooperation by defining those aspects of human intelligence that are relational future focused and compassionate.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
The AI dialogue has an opportunity to use AI itself to farm cultivate and make meaning from large inputs from across all nationalities skill levels and points of view. Use The massive collecting and sorting capabilities of the tool to get real insights from the largest group of people ever.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
The global environmental community indigenous cultures of course and the working poor in most industrialized cultures
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
We should engage the AI companies themselves to help us develop frameworks for collecting unprecedented amounts of data and information from the public at scale