Georgia State University
Academia Global
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Clear methods to evaluate AI tool risk; Methods to ensure that AI doesn't turn into skynet and takeover, wiping out humanity.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Interoperability of governance approaches
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
We must ensure that AI doesn't displace humans in all aspects or at least use AI to make the current systems of humanity better. Is AI what brings us UBI, for example.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
1
How do we evaluate AI tools in practice?
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
AI use is unregulated in the USA.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
We need to ensure that AI is in service to humanity not something that displaces humanity
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Do we as a society even want AI, or is it being pushed onto us by tech companies?