Skip to content

Africa ICT Alliance (AfICTA)

Private Sector Africa

Responses

In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?

A successful inaugural Dialogue must transition from abstract principles to tangible, implementation-oriented frameworks. Key outcomes would include the formal alignment of global AI governance with the specific developmental needs of the Global South, as articulated in the Cotonou Declaration on Accelerating Africa's Digital Transformation. This ensures that global mandates do not create new barriers for developing economies but instead facilitate "leapfrogging" traditional developmental stages through strategic AI adoption. Success should also yield a consolidated roadmap for implementing the Global Digital Compact (GDC), with dedicated financing mechanisms for infrastructure. A critical indicator is the democratization of hardware resources; currently, Africa possesses only 1,000 GPUs compared to a single global tech corporation's 250,000. Furthermore, the Dialogue should result in a centralized monitoring system within the United Nations, supported by specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to track progress in digital inclusion and literacy at the national level. Finally, success involves formalizing multi-stakeholder participation to ensure the African private sector has a permanent seat at the decision-making table.

From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?

  • AI capacity-building
  • Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
  • Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
  • Open-source software, open data and open AI models

Please briefly explain your selection.

5

These priorities reflect a holistic approach to bridging the "AI gap" while fostering indigenous innovation. ·AI Capacity-development: With over 70% of Africans under the age of 25, the skills gap is a primary bottleneck. We advocate for a phased "crawl, walk, run, fly" pedagogical approach to build technical expertise and "future citizen" awareness. ·Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI: Digital trust is the currency of the digital economy. Widespread adoption in sectors like finance and logistics requires safety from fraud and cybercrime, making technical standards like the transition to IPv6 essential for network security. ·Social and Ethical Implications: AI must be contextually relevant. Global models often suffer from information asymmetry, marginalizing African languages and values. Governance must ensure inclusive design that empowers youth, women, and persons with disabilities rather than excluding them. Open-source, Open Data, and Open Models: Access to high-quality training data is a major barrier for local developers. Developing "data pools as commons" is a strategic priority for digital sovereignty, reducing reliance on foreign proprietary software and cloud services.

In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.

4

Several emerging issues are critical to the African context and should be addressed: ·The Energy-Connectivity Nexus: There is no connectivity without energy. Only about 43% of Africans have reliable power, creating a physical bottleneck for data centers and AI processing. Governance must integrate green energy strategies with digital roadmaps. ·Digital Sovereignty and Infrastructure: Africa has less than 1% of the world's data center capacity. This forces local innovators to rely on foreign services, increasing latency and exposing data to external legal risks. ·Policy Agility Deficit: Many nations struggle to develop rapid regulations for emerging tech, leading to reactive governance that lags behind technological shifts. ·Pedagogy and Localized Literacy: Using storytelling and other indigenous methods is essential to educate children and rural communities about AI, effectively countering information asymmetry between tech producers and consumers.

How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.

Regulatory fragmentation is a significant challenge; twenty-two African nations still lack comprehensive data protection laws, which inhibits the creation of a seamless Digital Single Market. ·Challenges: The "Enforcement Gap" is critical. While 34 countries have established Data Protection Authorities, 20 lack the resources to enforce them effectively. For SMEs, high implementation costs and a "Mobile-Centric Governance Gap" leave many users exposed to cyber risks that are not sufficiently prioritized in current frameworks. ·Opportunities: Despite gaps, AI offers transformative potential. Machine learning models are already optimizing port traffic in logistics and predictively managing agricultural yields. Digital identity systems, such as Nigeria's NIN, provide a foundation for secure e-government services and broader financial inclusion.

What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?

The AI Dialogue can advance cooperation by harmonizing institutional coherence. It provides a universal home to align digital transformation strategies across different regions, ensuring interoperability between data governance and cybersecurity frameworks. It can facilitate a dedicated Global Digital Compact Office at the UN to coordinate multi-stakeholder implementation. Furthermore, it serves as a platform to advocate for global financial institutions to support digital infrastructure in developing regions, treating secure internet access as a human right that engenders prosperity.

What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?

The Dialogue should build upon and connect with existing mechanisms to avoid duplication: ·WSIS+20 and the IGF: Leveraging established multi-stakeholder models for policy design. In order to avoid long term duplication of the AI Dialogue, it is our expectation that the Dialogue would feature as part of the Internet Governance Forum which is a forum for Internet Governance and digital policy issues of which AI governance is a part. ·African Union Strategies: Aligning with the AU Digital Transformation Strategy and the forthcoming continental AI strategy. ·Regional Economic Commissions: Collaborating with UNECA to integrate regional review outcomes into global documents. ·Sector Partnerships: Connecting with groups like Smart Africa and the Digital Impact Alliance which are already working on data protection. Added Value: The Dialogue's unique value lies in creating a unified implementation roadmap and a monitoring system using specific KPIs to hold member states accountable for their digital commitments.

How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.

Stakeholders should contribute as equal partners in a participatory governance model that involves governments, the private sector, civil society, and academia. ·Format: We recommend quarterly regional eConferences and annual summits to ensure policy remains responsive to national and regional shifts. ·Structure: Sessions should use interactive "World Café" formats and digital tools for real-time feedback. Additionally, every country should establish a national multi-stakeholder ICT council to co-design and co-own digital strategies, ensuring sustainability beyond government cycles.

Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?

Several perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions, notably the African private sector and SMEs, whose practical expertise in low-resource settings is often missing. Youth, women, and rural communities are also frequently excluded, leading to design biases in AI tools. Furthermore, linguistic minorities are overlooked in the development of Large Language Models. Inclusion Methods: Providing financial support for representatives from SMEs and civil society to attend global forums, alongside creating regional review mechanisms, is essential for equitable participation.

What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?

10. Innovative Engagement Formats ·Storytelling: Using culturally resonant narratives to explain complex AI implications to children and non-technical adults. This should also reflect what African elders have in mind ·Interactive eConferences: Utilizing real-time polls and sentiment measurement during sessions to foster dynamic engagement. ·Regulatory Sandboxes: Collaborative, safe spaces where regulators, startups, and civil society experiment with AI technologies against existing frameworks to build trust before full market deployment. The use of the Sao Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines at the global, regional, sub-regional and national tracks of the Dialogue.

Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.

2

Rwanda - Smart Rwanda Master Plan In Rwanda, the Smart Rwanda Master Plan has driven a 25% increase in STEM enrollment by integrating ICT into the education system, strengthening digital skills development at an early stage. Kenya - M-Pesa In Kenya, M-Pesa has achieved 90% adult usage and helped lift approximately 194,000 households out of extreme poverty, highlighting the transformative role of mobile financial services. South Africa - SA Connect Project In South Africa, the SA Connect Project is working toward 80% household connectivity by 2026 through the expansion of affordable broadband infrastructure. Nigeria - Integrated NIN Ecosystem In Nigeria, the Integrated National Identity Number (NIN) Ecosystem, led by National Identity Management Commission, has surpassed 100 million enrollments. It provides a foundational digital identity layer that enables access to banking and healthcare, while also serving as a regional model for interoperability. Africa - OSIA Standard At the continental level, the OSIA Standard represents the first African-developed international framework for digital identity, reflecting strong collaboration among multiple stakeholders across Africa. Congo Brazzaville - AI Research Center In Republic of the Congo, the AI Research Center is emerging as a technical hub for regional AI research and data governance strategy. AfICTA - Quarterly eConferences Across the continent, AfICTA's Quarterly eConferences provide a platform for SMEs to access AI expertise and policy insights, supporting digital innovation and capacity building.