Veritas Expert Services
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
-A common language guide/reference in the scope of the expected outcomes. -A training program to support the continuity of the dialogue. -A series of dialogue sections for 2026/2027. -Policies & Standandars. -Create sectoral committees to support specific needs.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
Safe, secure and trustworthy AI;
Please briefly explain your selection.
We have several customers (companies) asking for solutions to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy AI.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
Themes related to Education.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Healthcare safety & AI use must be discussed to enable safety and human rights, and not just AI technology. It is not about the best technology. It is about human integrity before tech-solutions.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Providing guidance and integration among concerned entities (gov, private, etc) in practical ways.
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Connecting with local/regional initiatives will helping "dialogues" works in a contextual (local) reality.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Expertise, Mentoring, Publishing, Sharing Experiences and Cases.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Healthcare for disabilities/special patients Standards experts
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
It depends on what outcomes will be defined.
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
1
Several IEEE Standards. I am available to help listing all and voluteering as needed.