CEPOL - EU Law Enforcement Training Agency
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
A unified position of the risks of AI and a focus on risk based approach at global level.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- AI capacity-building
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Protection and promotion of human rights
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
It is of the utmost importance that we focus on the social implications of AI and approach the field with a human centric focus, AI should be used to create opportunity and better the lives of humanity as a hole, not benefit a handful of tech moguls.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
The rapid advancements being made in humanoid robots, and the interaction or relations with AI.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
In the EU we are lucky enough to have the AI Act which focuses on a risk based approach to AI systems. However on global scale, we can see that there is a race to develop the first Artificial General Intelligence and then Artificial Super Intelligence, at any cost. This is something that should be addressed on a global level.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
The AI Dialogue can play an important role especially if major AI players are involved, as we need to have serious conversations on global level about the direction towards we are heading with the ever-increasing speed of AI development and the major disruption it will have on our society in the near future.
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
The center for humane technology
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Hybrid, onsite and online versions could work well for more inclusive dialogue.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
I think society at large is underrepresented and generally speaking, politicians (with some exceptions) are not yet grasping the real implications that AI has already begun to have on our society.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
I don`t know if anything more than online/onsite format, maybe some sort of app that could be widespread to act as a link between society and decision makers on AI governance.
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
1
EU AI Act