Bangladesh Center for Indo-Pacific Affairs
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Transparency in the uses of AI in governance and mitigating risk.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- AI capacity-building
- Protection and promotion of human rights
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
AI need to be safe, secure and trustworthy other than that it is a potential risk. As making it safer AI capacity building need to be a priority. There are several uses of AI and it is being used in every aspects of human life to broden the understanding of the uses are mandatory. Last and the foremost important is to protect and promote the rights of human just for being human.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
N/A
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Mainly in Bangladesh people are not sure about the capacity and capabilities of AI. Their uses and other important perspectives like implications, trustworthiness and finally the global changes coming because of it.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
It will ensure the participants of everyone without falling behind. Which will create more interest to work on, do more research, take furthur steps and help the humanity.
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Creating a network, build cloud like system so everyone remain connected, gets the update. Dissemination of knowledge and uses of AI will further help. Most important it to secure humanity.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Changes are equal for all. Some are prepaired some are not. Some remains in the game and same are out of it. Which ultimately lead to the vanquish of their existence. So I think each and every stakeholders have different role to play to make the world more human centric and for the betterment.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Third world countries whose gdp and everything is under the line. Hardly they are prepared.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Providing eqaul placement and equal importance to each and everyone.
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
Sorry, I am not sure about it now. But further looking into it.