The Open University
Academia Western Europe and Other States
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
A shared document agreeing at least on what is harm (AI harm) and what should be done in terms of guidelines to prevent ans mitigate harm through governance recommendations.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
Without transparent trustworthy and aecure AI any gouvernance frameworks are useless.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Agreed ontology of understanding from harm to mitigations strategies.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
All voices should be heard including from minority groups, everything should be captured properly and actioned upon. I suggest this is done as a participatory action research set of activities.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Religious minorities