Suleyman Demirel University
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
I think taking opinions of students, academicians, researchers is really important. I think having opinions of student communities, SDGS, instutions related to AI, governmental policies and reports, reports of city councils, NGOs, higher instutions are really important. I also think having opinions of law, psychology, engineering, socilogy, education departments are also really important.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- AI capacity-building
- Protection and promotion of human rights
Please briefly explain your selection.
I think these areas are most important factors in AI development.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
I think AI ethics, disinformation, misuse of AI, psychological effects of AI, copyrights, pedagogical issues are really effecting AI Governance in my country
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
I think international multidisciplinary and multicultural projects may affect AI governance.
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
I think we should develop AI projects with different universities, student communities, NGOS, SDGS from Türkiye and different countries and with important technology companies like Aselsan, Microsoft, etc.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Instutions, law departments, engineering departments, architecture departments, graphic design departments, psychological departments should give their opinions about this subject. I think there should be some workshops related to AI, design, AI ethics, AI and leadership, AI and data management and AI's psychological, law, educational effects and developing AI communities and programmes.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
I think voice of teachers, psychology departments, law departments, students, industry, technological companies and personal indivuals is really important.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Interviews, articles, videos, forums,
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
-