Self
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Mandate that the AI committee create a set of policies and procedures that align with the UN and its purpose. There must be agreed terms so that no one persons opinion can be bought or persuaded .
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Protection and promotion of human rights
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
- Interoperability of governance approaches
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
If there is a motivation of money or power over the people than one's ethics, humans rights, beliefs in religion and culture could be taken over from the people. We people need not be so lazy when it comes to work and communication and not fully relay on a machine to do work for us as we will loose intelligence and character.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
1
Health. The input of a machine or AI into a human and replacing one's free will to think or communicate for themselves. To be used as a robot or experiment. The mind and the spirit are one, according to Christianity. To replace the mind is to replace the spirit and ultimately the soul.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Communities. The shortage runs from the ground up, but is managed from the up to the ground. So the gaps fall in between. Without proper communication, and leadership in the high ranking, the communities have no resources to better themselves. Health declines, so the upper may feel like AI is needed when it's not. Change in leadership approach is.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
There would be no need for AI if people stoped hating and we were at peace with one another. If there were no need for so much we wouldn't be fighting over things and killing each other. Love and peace is missing.
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Social media content. What allowed. Buy selling and trading capabilities that one fully dependent on online or AI income.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Be open and honest. Always put people first and the future of our world. Be not motivated by money.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Social media and apps on TV being controlled by algorithms that confuse the mind.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
The investigation of social media content and what's allowed and shared publicly to people
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
I haven't met any yet