Gendarmerie Academy
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Public perception of AI applications and determinants of public acceptance of different forms of AI, particularly legitimate use of facial recognition technology.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
Please briefly explain your selection.
I specifically concern AI-powered biometrics and its implications in law enforcement use of open public spaces.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
2
Surveillance and misalignment of AI
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
There are regulatory lacuna in law enforcement deployments of AI-powered biometrics, specifically real time recognition systems.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Global standart for responsible use of facial recognition technology and emphasize standards for avoid algorithmic bias and ensure agile framework for robust governance of AI surveillance system
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Policy learning cases and good cases adapting regulate FRT including regulatory sandboxes or algorithmic impact assessments.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Law enforcement officers and organizations from around the world and FRT industry.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Representative public voices survey might be suitable. It should include ethnically minorities which is specifically crucial for understanding algorithmic bias considerations in vulnerable groups.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Public forum and quadruple helix model.
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
3
Agile regulations and context specific standards for FRT and behavioral AI. Further, moratorium and prohibition is necessary for some use cases such as real time FRT use in süpermarket.