Ex civil servant
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Priorotize sector for use of AI for better governance,data protection and Capacity building of the concerned
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- AI capacity-building
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Open-source software, open data and open AI models
Please briefly explain your selection.
2
Data protection against unauthorised use..Development of AI models for better governance to ensure that the benefits accrue to all and oversight on agreed parameters for safe use of AI to enhance social and economic progress .
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
The Intellectual property rights developed using AI and how to approach this subject along with use of AI for better governance including health and education
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Since the Development of AI is concentrated in few countries therefore it is important to promote open source software ensuring data protection and adequate safeguards for the rest of the world .
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
The dialogue is expected to identify priority areas and issues for discussion and devising way forward. The required regulations and mechanisms to agreed upon to ensure standards for governance of AI
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
The ongoing discussions in WIPO on Intellectual Property Rights generated involving use of AI.The resultant protection that needs to be provided to ensure the availability of AI models for further research avoiding IPRs being protected as Trade Secrets
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Academia,research organization ,tech firms and software houses . Government organizations ,regularity bodies and intergovernmental.organizations
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Health workers,school teachers,industrial workers farmers etc their inputs are required along with the need to build capacity building on use of AI tools
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Online discussions, lectures and prespectives of leading researches and representatives of Academia
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
2
WIPO dialogue on the AI and its use in IRPs .standard Data protection laws to ensure protection against misuse, labour policies ,industrial policies, IT policies