Hebed AI

Private Sector Global

Responses

In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?

A successful dialogue would enable open exchange between stakeholders on real AI-in-production challenges, data leaks, compliance, and visibility. It should align on practical priorities and bridge the gap between policy and operational implementation.

From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?

Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI;Interoperability of governance approaches;Transparency, accountability, and human oversight;Safe, secure and trustworthy AI;

Please briefly explain your selection.

Focus on safe, trustworthy AI, real-world impacts, aligned regulations, and transparency to ensure control, compliance, and responsible deployment.

In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.

Shift from reactive to proactive AI governance, with real-time visibility and adaptive controls.

How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.

In Switzerland, gaps in AI governance create risks (shadow AI, compliance) but offer strong opportunities in trusted, secure AI leadership.

Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?

Young entrepreneurs and startups are underrepresented; including them brings practical, real-world insights on AI use, risks, and governance challenges.

Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.