Independant

AI Serving Humanity While Preserving Human Roles* Artificial intelligence should be developed as a tool that strengthens human capability without replacing the human role in society. The objective is not full automation, but meaningful augmentation, where AI supports human judgment rather than substitutes it. Humans must remain the primary decision-makers, especially in areas involving ethics, responsibility, and social impact. While systems built on Machine Learning can analyze vast amounts of data and generate insights, they do not possess human understanding, values, or lived experience. Therefore, accountability and final authority should always stay with people. Equally important is preserving core human domains such as empathy, creativity, and moral reasoning. AI can assist in these areas but should not replace human leadership within them. At the same time, AI systems should be designed to enhance human learning and critical thinking, ensuring that individuals grow more capable rather than dependent on automated outputs. Governance also plays a key role. Frameworks like the EU AI Act emphasize human oversight and responsibility, helping ensure that technological progress aligns with human values and rights. In the end, AI serves humanity best when it expands what people can do while preserving their central role as decision-makers and meaning-makers. The focus should remain on empowering humans—not making them secondary to the systems they create.

• Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
• Protection and promotion of human rights
• Open-source software, open data and open AI models
• Safe, secure and trustworthy AI

Ai should be use in a ethical way in order to server human, guide him and helping him gaining times in his everyday life but without taking human place and role in life.

The place of human in the area of area and the fear that AI will take human job and role in society

In case, living in France, i think France is not fully aligned with countries like the U.S. and Canada in AI development and governance pace, as it prioritizes regulation and risk management, which can slow innovation and create complexity compared to more agile ecosystems.

Allow different country to get a whole picture of what is going on AI and how problems is facing from one country zone to another.

AI dialogue can build a platform that allow us to regulate the use of AI and allow different people unite by the passion of AI to connect and share they fear, concern and progress in order to allow to use AI in a good way without loosing our core humanity.

Different stakeholders play distinct but complementary roles in contributing to an effective AI Dialogue. Governments are responsible for setting policy frameworks, ensuring public safety, and coordinating international cooperation. Industry actors contribute technical expertise, practical experience, and the implementation of responsible AI systems. Academia and researchers provide independent analysis on AI risks, ethics, and long-term impacts, while civil society organizations represent public interests, focusing on issues such as fairness, accountability, and human rights. International organizations, such as the United Nations and OECD, can help align global standards and facilitate inclusive, cross-border collaboration. The general public also plays a role by contributing perspectives on acceptable use and societal expectations. To ensure effectiveness, the AI Dialogue should adopt a structured, multi-stakeholder format with balanced representation across regions and sectors. Discussions can be organized into thematic working groups (e.g., ethics, safety, governance, and economic impact), supported by plenary sessions to consolidate shared principles. The process should be continuous rather than one-off, with clear milestones, follow-ups, and transparent documentation of outcomes. A key guiding principle of the dialogue should be the ethical use of AI. AI systems must be designed and deployed in ways that respect human rights, promote fairness, and avoid harm. Importantly, AI should remain a tool that supports human decision-making rather than replacing human roles in society. Maintaining human oversight, accountability, and agency ensures that AI enhances human capabilities without undermining responsibility, dignity, or societal function.

Several important voices are still underrepresented in global AI governance discussions, which can limit how inclusive, fair, and effective the resulting policies are. We should include artists, teachers, African community, Indigenous communities, small business, youth and future generation, woman entreprener... A more inclusive AI governance system requires intentionally amplifying voices that are often excluded. By combining diverse representation, accessible participation mechanisms, and sustained engagement, global AI discussions can better reflect the needs and realities of all communities affected by AI.

The most effective formats are those that are interactive, inclusive, and outcome-driven, combining structured collaboration, real-world scenarios, and broad participation (like workshops, survey, experts insights...) . These approaches help move the AI Dialogue from passive discussion toward practical, shared solutions that reflect diverse global perspectives.