Private capacity
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
It would identify the priorities UN should adopt to further the discussion and colobrative work on AI. Taking onboard the research being conducted using AI and Intellectual property among others issues.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
2
AI capacity-building;Open-source software, open data and open AI models;Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI;Safe, secure and trustworthy AI;
Please briefly explain your selection.
The use of AI is spreading at a fast pace so if is very important to build capacity ,enhance understanding of AI ,support open source software and also research its wider implications so as to promote safe and effective use of AI for Humanity and earth at large
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
These are listed but the research being conducted has to be published so that further research and development can occur .Thus development of new models for protection of AI needs to be adopted to avoid AI going towards protection as trade secrets .
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Since AI driven developments are concentrated in few countries only therefore it is important that the benefits be shared on fair equitable basis for betterment of social services with the rest of the world .This will promote efficieny and enhance further development in new frontiers .
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
It will pave way for shared and agreed dynamics , developing rules and regulations to address the possible unintended outcomes and promote further research and developments
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
The ongoing debate within the WIPO ,research in leading Universities and research institutions
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Stakholders from research institutions particularly in health ,education, social services ,regulatory organizations ,planning and development institutions,government and INGOs needs to be included
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Representatives from Labour sector with possible impact on jobs and workers .Citizens from far flung communities .Enhancement on tools AI for School teachers ,health workers and industrial workers , farmers ,students to ascertain their needs and requirements
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Online discussions ,case studies for enhancements in various sectors and issues pertaining to different geological zones
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
1
The first important issue will be personal data protection and o ensure its use for public good and not undermining personal space or security .Use of the data fir effective laning and development