Ministry of finance and development in Somaliland/Somalia

In my opinion, the dialogue will be successful if it leads to practical and inclusive outcomes, not just discussions. It should bring together different countries and stakeholders to agree on clear and realistic actions for responsible AI use. One important outcome would be creating opportunities for developing countries to benefit from AI through training, knowledge sharing, and support. Many countries still lack the skills and resources to use AI effectively, so this dialogue should help close that gap. It would also be successful if it builds trust in AI by promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability. People need to feel confident that AI is being used in a safe and ethical way. Finally, the dialogue should create long-term cooperation between countries, institutions, and young professionals. Strong partnerships will help ensure that the ideas discussed are implemented in real life and not forgotten after the event.

Safe, secure and trustworthy AI;AI capacity-building;Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI;Protection and promotion of human rights;

I selected these priorities because I believe AI should be useful, fair, and accessible to everyone. In my country, there is still limited awareness and skills related to AI, so capacity-building is very important. It can help young people and professionals gain the knowledge they need to use AI in a positive way. I also chose safe and trustworthy AI because people need to feel confident when using these technologies. If AI systems are not reliable or transparent, it can create fear and misuse. The social and economic impact of AI is another important area, as AI is already changing jobs, education, and communication. It is important to make sure these changes benefit everyone and not just a few groups. Lastly, I selected human rights because AI must respect privacy, fairness, and equality. It should not harm people or create discrimination. Overall, my choices reflect my interest in making AI practical, responsible, and beneficial for communities like mine.

Yes, I believe there are some important issues that need more attention. One of them is the digital divide. Many people in developing countries still do not have access to technology, internet, or proper training, which limits their ability to benefit from AI. Another issue is data privacy. People should know how their data is used and have control over it. This is important for building trust in AI systems. I also think the environmental impact of AI should be considered. AI systems can use a lot of energy, and this may affect sustainability in the long term. Finally, young people should be more involved in AI discussions. They are the future users and innovators, so their ideas and participation are very important for shaping better policies.

In my country, AI is still new, but the effects of weak governance can already be seen. One of the biggest challenges is that there are no clear rules or policies guiding how AI should be used. Because of this, people and institutions may use these technologies without fully understanding the risks, especially when it comes to privacy and data protection. Another issue is the lack of skills and awareness. Many young people are interested in technology, but there are not enough training opportunities or resources to help them learn about AI in a practical way. This makes it harder for us to keep up with global developments. At the same time, I see a lot of opportunities. AI has the potential to improve important areas like education, business, and public services. For example, it can make learning more accessible and help businesses work more efficiently. It can also open new job opportunities for young people if they are given the right support. I believe that if proper steps are taken now—such as raising awareness, building skills, and introducing simple guidelines—AI can have a very positive impact. Overall, while there are clear challenges, there is also a big chance for countries like mine to grow with AI in a way that is fair, useful, and inclusive.

I believe the AI Dialogue can play an important role by bringing countries together to share ideas, experiences, and practical solutions. For countries like mine, where AI is still developing, this kind of platform is very valuable because we can learn from others who are more advanced. It can also help create a common understanding of how AI should be used responsibly. Right now, different countries are moving at different speeds, and without cooperation, it may lead to confusion or unfair use of technology. Another important role is giving a voice to developing countries. Many global discussions are led by more developed nations, but countries like mine also need to be part of the conversation so that our challenges and needs are considered. The Dialogue can also support partnerships, such as training programs, knowledge sharing, and technical support. These kinds of collaborations can help build local skills and improve our ability to use AI in a positive way. In my view, the AI Dialogue is not just about discussion, but about creating connections and practical support that can help all countries move forward together.

There are already some global efforts related to AI, including initiatives by international organizations, research institutions, and private companies. However, many of these are not easily accessible or well connected to developing countries like mine. For example, there are online courses, partnerships, and policy discussions happening in different parts of the world, but awareness about them is still low in my region. This creates a gap between global progress and local participation. The AI Dialogue can help by connecting these existing efforts and making them more inclusive. It can act as a bridge between global initiatives and countries that are still developing their AI capacity. One important added value is that it can focus on practical impact, not just theory. It can help translate global ideas into actions that work in local contexts, such as training programs, policy guidance, and support for young professionals. It can also improve coordination between different stakeholders, including governments, universities, and the private sector. By bringing everyone together, the Dialogue can avoid duplication and make efforts more effective. Overall, I believe the AI Dialogue can make a real difference by making existing initiatives more connected, inclusive, and useful for countries like mine.

Different stakeholders can contribute in different but important ways. Governments can help by creating clear policies and supporting national strategies for AI. Universities and schools can focus on education and research, helping young people understand and use AI responsibly. The private sector can bring innovation, tools, and real-world experience. In countries like mine, collaboration between these groups is still limited, so the AI Dialogue can help bring them together in one space. In terms of format, I think the Dialogue should be simple and inclusive. It should include open discussions, small group sessions, and practical workshops where participants can share real experiences, not just ideas. It would also be helpful to include online participation, so people who cannot travel can still join. Clear and simple language should be used so that everyone can understand, even those who are not experts. Overall, the Dialogue should focus on participation, sharing knowledge, and finding practical solutions that can work in different countries.

Many voices are still missing in global discussions on AI, especially from developing countries like mine. Young people, local communities, and small organizations often do not have the chance to participate, even though they are directly affected by these technologies. People from rural areas are also underrepresented because they may not have access to the internet or information about these opportunities. In addition, individuals without a technical background are often left out, even though their perspectives are important. To include these groups, there should be more awareness and outreach at the local level. Information about AI and related events should be shared in simple language and through different channels, not only online. Providing financial support or scholarships can also help people from low-income backgrounds participate. Most importantly, the Dialogue should create a welcoming environment where everyone feels comfortable sharing their ideas, regardless of their background or level of expertise.

To make the AI Dialogue more engaging, it should go beyond formal presentations. Interactive sessions can make a big difference. For example, small group discussions where participants share their own experiences can help people learn from each other in a practical way. Workshops and real-life case discussions would also be useful, especially for participants from countries like mine who want to understand how AI can be applied in everyday situations. Another idea is to include question-and-answer sessions where participants can directly speak with experts. This makes the discussion more open and less one-sided. Online participation should also be included, such as live sessions or virtual discussions, so more people can join from different countries. Finally, using simple activities like polls or short feedback sessions can help everyone feel involved. In my opinion, the best format is one that allows people to speak, share, and learn from each other, not just listen.

In my country, AI is still developing, so there are not many formal policies yet. However, there are some practical approaches that can support good AI governance. One important example is the growing use of digital services, such as mobile money and online platforms, which have helped improve access to financial services. These systems show how technology can be useful when it is simple, accessible, and trusted by the public. Another good practice is focusing on education and skills development. Some universities and training centers are starting to introduce ICT and technology-related programs. Expanding these efforts to include AI would help prepare young people for future opportunities. Awareness is also very important. Community-level programs or workshops can help people understand how technology works and how to use it safely. This can reduce risks such as misinformation or misuse of data. In terms of policy, I believe starting with simple and clear guidelines on data protection and ethical use of technology would be a strong first step. These do not need to be complex but should focus on fairness, transparency, and accountability. Overall, even small and practical steps-like improving digital literacy, building skills, and introducing basic guidelines-can make a big difference in supporting responsible and effective AI governance in countries like mine.