IAPHL
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
The first global dialogue on AI governance would be success if the elevates the control and choices of the public without stifling the diffusion of impactful innovation
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
- Interoperability of governance approaches
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
Please briefly explain your selection.
With safety and security, people and organizations are more confident to approach the world of AIand every other thing follows
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
1
Data Infrastructure and material input to such infrastructure with safety and security implication.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Because of weak foreign policy and international relations, there seem to be lethargy or waste effort as governments approach AI especially from the perspective of data infrastructure and governance
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Smoothening out some relationships and trust to set pace for trusted complementarity in the international arena
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Some sort of conversation within WEF and Amy Webb book on Big Nine
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Approach different groups like IAPHL in buckets to reflect their unique experience and then aggregated in broader scheme of things.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
The last mile and the most part of the Africa in my opinion
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Some functional and focused group engagement that feeds the entire scheme
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
https://iaphl.org/