Ministry of health
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
To ensure the First Global Dialogue on AI Governance at Geneva is a systemic success, it must transcend ethical declarations and establish a framework for normative interoperability, particularly within the high-stakes domain of healthcare. Three critical outcomes would define this achievement:
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- AI capacity-building
- Interoperability of governance approaches
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
Please briefly explain your selection.
The selection of these four priorities is driven by the urgent need to transition from theoretical ethics to agile technical governance within complex health systems. For a national authority focused on strategic planning and hospital management, these pillars are not merely technical, but foundational to sovereignty and clinical safety .
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
While the identified themes provide a solid foundation, two major cross-cutting issues deserve urgent attention, particularly for health systems undergoing digital transformation:
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
The AI Dialogue in Geneva must be anchored within the existing international ecosystem while bridging the gap between political theory and sectoral application.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
To ensure its impact, the AI Dialogue must transition from passive consultation to a model of operational co-design. For a healthcare planning authority, the challenge is to translate ethical principles into actionable technical protocols.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
To surpass the limitations of traditional diplomatic conferences, the AI Dialogue must transition toward formats that prioritize technical co-creation and decision-making agility. The following four formats are recommended to foster meaningful engagement:
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
To transition from abstract principles to actionable policy, AI governance must rely on mechanisms that guarantee clinical safety and data sovereignty. The following four examples illustrate high-impact approaches within the African and Algerian contexts: