University of the Virgin Islands
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Build concensus on AI ethics, risks and design a framework restricting usage with side effect applications on the humanity.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
1
Safe, secure and trustworthy AI;Transparency, accountability, and human oversight;Protection and promotion of human rights;AI capacity-building;
Please briefly explain your selection.
3
AI technologies are here to stay and expand. Users must understand how use the technogy and how it is built, along with the limitations and risks. Since AI decisions can not be formally verified, human might remain in the loop to make critical decisions.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
2
Dominance of AI by few corporations with little supervision. Insufficient verification and validation. Development driven by profits instead of impact on humanity.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Little impact in the US Virgin Islands. Slow adoption pace.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Start by working workforce development and applications that have a high impact and low risks such food security, reducing poverty, heath care etc
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Start with education and workforce development.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Involve educators, NGOs, and k20 learners.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Communities with limited access to digital infrastructure.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Summer camps, open forum community of learners.