Skip to content

Trajectory Strategy and Management Consultants

Technical Community Africa

Responses

In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?

Inclusiveness and voices of individual researchers voices.

From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?

  • Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
  • AI capacity-building
  • Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
  • Open-source software, open data and open AI models

Please briefly explain your selection.

4

We need AI governance, human capacity for HITL, for responsible AI applications, safe data that prevents dangerous hallucinations and attribution and equity . We should not work for AI but AI should work for us.

In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.

Information and data systems safety.

How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.

Hallucinations and increased cybersecurity issues, poor productivity and performance, free labour and IP protection issues. Poor research and learning outcomes.overreliance and wrong use of AI.

What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?

Advocate for individual researchers in the global south and challenges .

What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?

Inclusiveness

How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.

Have different organizations in terms of structure and locality(from simple to most complex)

Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?

Global South individual researchers voices. Build them. Stop concetrating the voices of those already known yet are not well vast with the topic.AI is not a matter of physical or emotion but about interllect.

What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?

Peer-to-peer and mentorships

Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.

I have a framework called CAMEAL. I hope one day I get the opportunity to share.