Research Ethics Committee Involving Human Subjects - Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Compliance as an Advantage: Governance will increasingly be viewed as a competitive differentiator, with companies investing millions to ensure that their models are deemed secure and auditable. Data Sovereignty: Countries and regions are building their own "Sovereign AI" infrastructures, fearing technological dependence—a trend that fragments governance approaches.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Protection and promotion of human rights
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
Discussion regarding how regulation can be circumvented, necessitating more robust auditing mechanisms.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
1
All those described in the previously answered items. They require broad and unrestricted regulation within an inclusive framework, taking into account all the ethics involved.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
Global AI Capacity Fund and the sharing of computational resources. Emerging Risks and New Paradigms—Autonomous Agent Safety: Dialogues focused on AI systems that perform tasks autonomously and with minimal human supervision. Dual-Use AI: Threats posed by AI in the development of biological or cyber weapons.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Global AI Capacity Fund and the sharing of computational resources. Emerging Risks and New Paradigms—Autonomous Agent Safety: Dialogues focused on AI systems that perform tasks autonomously and with minimal human supervision. Dual-Use AI: Threats posed by AI in the development of biological or cyber weapons.
What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?
Global AI Capacity Fund and the sharing of computational resources. Emerging Risks and New Paradigms—Autonomous Agent Safety: Dialogues focused on AI systems that perform tasks autonomously and with minimal human supervision. Dual-Use AI: Threats posed by AI in the development of biological or cyber weapons.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
As I mentioned previously, it needs to be inclusive, free of prejudice, and—above all—possess impeccable ethical integrity.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
As I mentioned previously, it needs to be inclusive, free of prejudice, and—above all—possess impeccable ethical integrity.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
As I mentioned previously, it needs to be inclusive, free of prejudice, and—above all—possess impeccable ethical integrity.
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
As I mentioned previously, it needs to be inclusive, free of prejudice, and-above all-possess impeccable ethical integrity.