Wikimedia Italia
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Given the inclusion of multiple stakeholder in the dialogue, the definition of a policy allowing for identification of the extent of use of AI to generate, produce or offer a certain content and clear communication to the consumer of the content, product or service. The ability for the consumer to get a traditional content, product or service at his will.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
- Open-source software, open data and open AI models
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
In the context of information the certainty that a content or a service is generated: 1) Openly and with a model that is reproducible 2) the methodology of generation is clear and open to everyone 3) the responsibility for content or service generated is clear 4) should human supervision be needed, this can be enforced and mandated and the supervisor is identifiable and held responsible for the content he supervised.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
1
Privacy of data and capacity of an AI to store data (derived) for an arbitrarily long time. i.e. Privacy of transformed data.