Rev Julienne
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Agreement for guardrails and safety for Ai.
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
Please briefly explain your selection.
5
AI should be built safely and transparently AI companies are racing to build what they claim will be the most powerful technology ever invented - but they're doing it while deprioritizing safety. Companies regularly cut corners on safety testing, release products they don't fully understand, and incentivize silence among employees who could raise concerns. The result is a dangerous gap: the companies building AI hold most of the knowledge about this technology and its risks, while the public, regulators, and even users are left in the dark. This needs to change. Just like we require safety standards for aviation and medicine, AI needs independent oversight, rigorous testing, and real transparency - so that society can actually understand and trust the technology reshaping our world.
In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.
5
AI innovation should not come at the expense of our rights and freedom The AI industry runs on extracting value from people - their data, content, labor, and even their most private thoughts - with few laws to stop it. People's work is used to train AI models without permission, and bad actors are using AI to enable fraud, nonconsensual imagery, and CSAM. The same data fueling AI models is also enabling corporations and governments to surveil, track, and profile people at unprecedented scale. Without stronger protections, the erosion of privacy, autonomy, and free expression will only deepen in the age of AI. People deserve real protections: control over their own data, their likeness, and their right to think and speak freely without being exploited.
How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.
My sector could be all but eliminated if people are largely forming relationships with Ai.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
It's required to avoid disaster.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Pretty much everyone who is on the lower end of the economic spectrum which in many places including the US is getting larger every dat.
Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.
The Center for Humane Technology's road map for Ai as found here: https://www.humanetech.com/ai-roadmap#principle-5-ai-innovation-should-not-come-at-the-expense-of-our-rights-and-freedom