Skip to content
AI Dialogue Report
All submissions

University of Hawai'i

Technical Community Asia and the Pacific

Responses

In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?

Clear global guidance and recommendations on regulations for AI product creation and use across at-risk/vulnerable communities as well as clear recommendations on general regulation for education, medicine, warfare, and culture.

From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
  • Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
  • Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
  • Protection and promotion of human rights

Please briefly explain your selection.

I am most concerned about adversarial use and impacts of GenAI use across humanity.

In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.

1

Regulation

How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.

We have no regulation.

What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?

I think it begins by bringing concerns to the forefront and pushing for clear accountability across governmental bodies.

What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?

Government, large corporations, and indigenous/ethnic/cultural groups

How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.

Commitment to act and accountability and transparency mechanisms to show action being taken.

Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?

Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander

What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?

Live polling, breakout groups