Skip to content

Posetiv

Private Sector Western Europe and Other States

Responses

In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?

Open, honest dialogue with all members willing to contribute and share meaningful data and metrics. No selling, just a desire to improve and created a shared common approach

From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?

  • Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
  • Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
  • Protection and promotion of human rights
  • Interoperability of governance approaches

Please briefly explain your selection.

2

We need governance to cover the wider impact on society of AI adoption. We need common standards and an open approach to reporting and governance with complete transparency.

In your opinion, are there any cross-cutting or emerging issues not captured by the listed themes above? If so, please explain.

1

I'm disappointed that sustainability and environmental resource consumption do not appear prominently as a selection option

How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.

Lack of transparency, lack of governance, huge negative impacts on the next generations entering the workplace

What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?

In collating opinions, in building alliances, in ensuring we communicate as one and don't let "divide and conquer" to continue to win

What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?

Digital sustainability measurement, reporting analysis, calls for transparency from providers

How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.

Leadership input is critical as sadly starting from the bottom does not lead to change

Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?

Sustainability, climate risk etc.

What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?

Actually bringing hyperscaler AI providers to the conversation and getting them to answer the awkward questions around transparency that they are ducking

Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.

1

From my lens in sustainability they do not exist today