Skip to content

Private individual

Civil Society Africa

Responses

In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?

An international agreement to prevent the creation of superhuman AI (artificial general intelligence) and banning powerful AI systems that are given autonomy and agency.

From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?

  • Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
  • Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
  • Protection and promotion of human rights
  • Interoperability of governance approaches

Please briefly explain your selection.

8

Superintelligent AI/AGI will cause significant economic disruption- job losses at a global scale that will result in significant economic inequality and instability for which we as a society are not prepared or equipped to navigate and correct. Superintelligent AI can not be developed in a safe and secure manner and it poses an existential threat to all humanity. Superintelligent AI poses multiple other risks and dangers, including threatening democracy, loss of privacy, environmental risks, autonomous weapons, tyranny, biological weapons and cybersecurity attacks. These risks needs to be addressed at a global scale and requires an international treaty through a shared framework or international law against the development of superintelligent AI and for the development of safe, secure and trustworthy AI. 6 people should not be allowed to determine the fate of 8 billion people.

How are the governance gaps and related developments/advances in the thematic areas you selected above affecting your country, region, or sector? Please highlight the most significant challenges.

South Africa is already suffering a 31.4% unemployment rate (with youth unemployment at 43.8%). South Africa will experience significant job displacement and further hindering youth access to the workforce due to companies freezing vacancies and adopting AI which is stopping entry-level job creation. There is already extreme social inequality in South Africa which is being worsened by the implementation of AI. Over and above South Africa, AGI will cause mass structural unemployment globally, it will destroy the purchasing power of the working and middle class leading to global social inequality, increasing world hunger and depravity in society.

What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?

The implementation of an international law or treaty must be prioritised to prevent the creation of superintelligent artificial intelligence/AGI. This has to be done at a global/international level to ensure that competing countries agree to stop the development and race to AGI in order to protect humanity as a whole and ensure no one country obtains the level of power that will accompany having AGI.

What are some of the existing initiatives, partnerships, or mechanisms that the AI Dialogue should build upon or connect with, and what added value could the AI Dialogue bring?

Tristan Harris and the Center for Humane Technology- a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that today's most consequential technologies, such as AI and social media, actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it. They have launched a major workstream "AI and what makes us human". The focus areas include an AI roadmap outlining seven principles for humane AI, such as ensuring AI companies owe a duty of care to the public and that AI should not automate away meaningful work; new human rights to protect privacy and human well-being in an AI-driven future; economic impact advocacy to raise alarms about mutually assured political revolution where AI-driven job replacement could lead to global political instability. https://www.humanetech.com/ PauseAI- a global grassroots movement with volunteers, national leaders, and local communities across the world, all working toward the same goal: pausing frontier AI development until we can prove it's safe and keep it under democratic control - https://pauseai.info/

How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.

Input from experts such as Center for Humane Technology will provide the required perspective and seasoned technology expertise needed to identify and transform the most critical incentives, so that society can reap the benefits of technology — and minimize harm. Taken from their website.

Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?

The individuals and families that will be impacted by job losses as a result of the implementation of AI and even more so AGI. They could be included by having experts such as Tristan Harris or someone from the Center for Humane Technology speak on their behalf- to ensure the seriousness of the impacts and risks are explained to policy makers and global leaders.

Please share examples of policies, practices, platforms, or approaches that promote effective AI governance or offer concrete solutions to addressing its challenges.

"AI and What Makes Us Human" by Center for Humane Technology https://www.humanetech.com/ai-and-humanity