Private Person

A true undertaking that is inclusive for all individuals in impoverished countries, unlike capitalism where the impoverished were left behind and unable to meaningfully participate in the economy. AI companies should ultimately not be allowed to lobby for AI rules and regulations.

• Protection and promotion of human rights
• Transparency, accountability, and human oversight
• Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
• Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI

Given the New Yorker article about Sam Altman we absolutely cannot trust AI companies to self govern (we saw how that turned out with Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft), we need resolutions to protect the everyday individual and neuter the CEO's prevent them from steamrolling their ideas onto people. There are data centres planned that will consume as much resources as States, this conflicts directly with human needs of water, food and hospitable land, Same Altman compared AI to people in terms of running and training costs. but the fundamental point is lost, without people to be consumers absolutely nothing functions, no industry survives if there are no consumers. We also cannot allow AI to make decisions in war as we've already seen how it can go massively wrong. individuals using AI to make decisions should be held accountable to the ai's desision, and the companies making the AI's should share that responsibility as an additional cost as they have shipped software that is not reliable enough just to make a quick buck.

AI is accelerating the economic divide and threatening the very existence of humanity, not because it is amazing and can do all the work, but because the AI companies are sneezing every last drop out of the world creating an environment that is not conducive to human life.

the overall quality and reliability of software is dropping, and engineers are encouraged to us AI, while being told that AI will replace them in the near future. Data centres planned in water scares areas will destroy the regions in which they are built, by consuming all the natural resources that natural life needs to survive while contributing to climate change in was we cannot even begin to comprehend at this stage. The oily thing that AI is solving in a true fashion is the cost of human labor, get rid of employees and replace them with AI, (no medical needed, no holiday needed, no bonuses needed, no sick leave, no "bad days" just "productivity")

I don't know, I think this will be another Economic Forum type deal where rich and powerful people decide what they need to do to "fix" the issues that they themselves created. I'm homing my voice gets heard.

This should not be a Rich and powerful individual event, there should be more "average individuals" from poorer corners of the world and they should have as much sway in the conversation as the powerful, perhaps more so. The 99% need to be represented by the 99% not the 1%

Africa, Poor communities, people earning less than 10000 USD a year. They need to access to these systems, they need to be protected from the fallout, AI companies should be forced to protect these communities and these communities should be able to have independent studies facilitated to outline and present the effects of the AI industry on their local environment.

AI companies should not be able to dictate or lobby for rules and laws related to AI in any form. Every GW of energy they create for the data centres need to be paid for by them and they should be creating additional grid capacity, to give back to the populous. there should be independent audits and studies done on the AI companies and their models and this should be made public in full, all false and misleading claims by AI CEOs should carry a clarification of delinquent CEO/Director for life.