Footlamp Consulting
Private Sector Global
Responses
In your opinion, what outcomes would make the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance a success?
Agreed upon and immediately actionable regulations on developing superintelligence
From your perspective, which of the following thematic areas identified by the General Assembly Resolution 79/325 for the AI Dialogue reflect your priorities for urgent action and active engagement?
- Safe, secure and trustworthy AI
- Social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic and technical implications of AI
- Protection and promotion of human rights
- Open-source software, open data and open AI models
Please briefly explain your selection.
1
Priority #1 is ensuring humans are not eliminated by ASI. Then we tackle all the other challenges.
What role can the AI Dialogue play in advancing international cooperation on AI governance?
Diplomats can achieve global governance on this, just as we have with other threats.
How can different stakeholders contribute to the AI Dialogue? Please share recommendations for the format and structure of the AI Dialogue.
Gathering input from diverse perspectives creates the cognitive diversity needed to address this issue.
Which voices, communities, or perspectives are currently underrepresented in global discussions on AI governance? How could they be included?
Small countries like Dominica (I am a property owner there) whose citizens will be gravely affected by global decisions.
What innovative engagement formats could most effectively foster meaningful and dynamic engagement during the AI Dialogue?
Anonymous polling, clarity of roles for government decision-makers in attendance, psychological safety via quick and clear social contracting